Last week, Judge Richard Kramer, a local judge in California, ruled that there was "no rational purpose" to a ban on 'same-sex marriage' so the ban is unconstitutional.

But that's nonsense. Treating different relationships differently is entirely rational. This is just another example of an activist judge substituting his own opinion for the law.

California voters passed Proposition 22 in 2000, which defined marriage as a union between a man and a woman. The proposition, unfortunately, created a statute, not an amendment to the state constitution. The very left-wing California legislature has been working to undermine the statute ever since.