<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pentagon Report Documents Iraq - al Qaeda Connections...</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.federalistjournal.com/fedblog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3002" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.federalistjournal.com/fedblog/?p=3002</link>
	<description>A weblog from the editors of American Federalist Journal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 08:51:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Plumb Bob Blog &#187; Captured Papers Prove Saddam Ties to Terrorists; Press Lies Again</title>
		<link>http://www.federalistjournal.com/fedblog/?p=3002&#038;cpage=1#comment-14771</link>
		<dc:creator>Plumb Bob Blog &#187; Captured Papers Prove Saddam Ties to Terrorists; Press Lies Again</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 14:43:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.federalistjournal.com/fedblog/?p=3002#comment-14771</guid>
		<description>[...] and a generous interpretation of how the newspaper world got the story wrong. Thanks also go to The Unalienable Right, the blog from the editors of The Federalist Journal, for providing links to the most relevant [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and a generous interpretation of how the newspaper world got the story wrong. Thanks also go to The Unalienable Right, the blog from the editors of The Federalist Journal, for providing links to the most relevant [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Editors</title>
		<link>http://www.federalistjournal.com/fedblog/?p=3002&#038;cpage=1#comment-14769</link>
		<dc:creator>The Editors</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 03:57:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.federalistjournal.com/fedblog/?p=3002#comment-14769</guid>
		<description>What statements had no basis in fact? The Pentagon report documents multiple connections between Saddam Hussein&#039;s regime and various terrorist groups, including al Qaeda affiliated terrorist groups.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What statements had no basis in fact? The Pentagon report documents multiple connections between Saddam Hussein's regime and various terrorist groups, including al Qaeda affiliated terrorist groups.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brent</title>
		<link>http://www.federalistjournal.com/fedblog/?p=3002&#038;cpage=1#comment-14768</link>
		<dc:creator>Brent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 02:16:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.federalistjournal.com/fedblog/?p=3002#comment-14768</guid>
		<description>No...not if that is your weak response to my challenge.  There are a litany of pre war statements similar to the one above that blatantly making a connection I could provide you with. The 9/11 report, NIE, Senate Intelligence Report, and now the Pentagon study have all concluded those pre war statements have no basis in fact.  Yet you seem more troubled by merely the headlines (not even the whole article) used in MSM papers, than the representations previously made that have proven wrong. Representations our country based a decision to go to war upon.  I do not, as you, allege lying took place. I do however question the judgment of not just those who made the pre war representations, but yours as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No...not if that is your weak response to my challenge.  There are a litany of pre war statements similar to the one above that blatantly making a connection I could provide you with. The 9/11 report, NIE, Senate Intelligence Report, and now the Pentagon study have all concluded those pre war statements have no basis in fact.  Yet you seem more troubled by merely the headlines (not even the whole article) used in MSM papers, than the representations previously made that have proven wrong. Representations our country based a decision to go to war upon.  I do not, as you, allege lying took place. I do however question the judgment of not just those who made the pre war representations, but yours as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Editors</title>
		<link>http://www.federalistjournal.com/fedblog/?p=3002&#038;cpage=1#comment-14767</link>
		<dc:creator>The Editors</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 03:33:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.federalistjournal.com/fedblog/?p=3002#comment-14767</guid>
		<description>Brent,

Care to comment on the Pentagon report and the MSM lying about it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brent,</p>
<p>Care to comment on the Pentagon report and the MSM lying about it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
