Comments on: Democrats threaten censorship and retaliation if miniseries airs http://www.federalistjournal.com/fedblog/?p=2835 A weblog from the editors of American Federalist Journal Mon, 03 May 2010 08:51:46 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: bubba http://www.federalistjournal.com/fedblog/?p=2835&cpage=1#comment-12920 bubba Mon, 11 Sep 2006 08:39:23 +0000 http://www.federalistjournal.com/fedblog/?p=2835#comment-12920 Seems to me like the totalitarian nature of Democrats has been exposed. "Path to 9/11" doesn't even come close to the fabrications and machinations of Fahrenheit 911. Consider the Democrats call for censorship along with their whole-hearted support of Moore's propaganda, I would say the Soviet Union is alive and well. Seems to me like the totalitarian nature of Democrats has been exposed. "Path to 9/11" doesn't even come close to the fabrications and machinations of Fahrenheit 911. Consider the Democrats call for censorship along with their whole-hearted support of Moore's propaganda, I would say the Soviet Union is alive and well.

]]> By: Flopping Aces » Blog Archive » Osama In The Crosshairs http://www.federalistjournal.com/fedblog/?p=2835&cpage=1#comment-12902 Flopping Aces » Blog Archive » Osama In The Crosshairs Fri, 08 Sep 2006 18:45:24 +0000 http://www.federalistjournal.com/fedblog/?p=2835#comment-12902 [...] The Unalienable Right [...] [...] The Unalienable Right [...]

]]> By: The Editors http://www.federalistjournal.com/fedblog/?p=2835&cpage=1#comment-12900 The Editors Fri, 08 Sep 2006 14:14:10 +0000 http://www.federalistjournal.com/fedblog/?p=2835#comment-12900 <blockquote>"Am I correct that few challenged the actual facts in "Fahrenheit 911"?</blockquote> No, that is incorrect. <blockquote>"and it apparently fabricating events [sic]"</blockquote> That cannot be apparent to you unless you've already seen the film. We agree that there should be little tolerance for bending of facts.

"Am I correct that few challenged the actual facts in "Fahrenheit 911"?

No, that is incorrect.

"and it apparently fabricating events [sic]"

That cannot be apparent to you unless you've already seen the film.

We agree that there should be little tolerance for bending of facts.

]]> By: sdk http://www.federalistjournal.com/fedblog/?p=2835&cpage=1#comment-12899 sdk Fri, 08 Sep 2006 07:04:04 +0000 http://www.federalistjournal.com/fedblog/?p=2835#comment-12899 Am I correct that few challenged the actual facts in "Fahrenheit 911"? Rather it was the tenor of the film and selective use of the factual information. This ABC public airway broadcast is a drama -- with actors -- and it apparently fabricating events which never happened. Of course, this happens all of the time when one's favorite novel reaches the bigt screen. However, the sensitive nature of the events of 911 would necessarily bring any depiction of those events under scrutiny, and likely be criticized. Perhaps Disney needs to present the movie on the silver screen and not on public airways. Also, since this movie was part of a tandem educational product for student's, there should be less tolerance with the bending of the facts and 'dramatization' of events. Am I correct that few challenged the actual facts in "Fahrenheit 911"? Rather it was the tenor of the film and selective use of the factual information.

This ABC public airway broadcast is a drama -- with actors -- and it apparently fabricating events which never happened. Of course, this happens all of the time when one's favorite novel reaches the bigt screen.

However, the sensitive nature of the events of 911 would necessarily bring any depiction of those events under scrutiny, and likely be criticized.

Perhaps Disney needs to present the movie on the silver screen and not on public airways. Also, since this movie was part of a tandem educational product for student's, there should be less tolerance with the bending of the facts and 'dramatization' of events.

]]>