The Unalienable Right
Wednesday - October 18, 2017


« « John “Screw them”* Kerry | MAIN | Defining normalcy down » »


Warriors and wusses and confused liberals

This column in the Los Angeles Times by Joel Stein, Warriors and wusses, has been getting some attention today, mainly in the form of outrage that anyone would come right out and admit they “don’t support our troops.” He tries to bury his point in snarky humor, but it’s pretty clear he really believes the central theme of the article.

First, we must applaud Mr. Stein for at least being honest. Sure, his viewpoint is morally confused drivel, but at least he doesn’t hide his real view, like so many on the left do these days: “This is an illegal, immoral, unjust, fascist, Hitler-esque, neo-con war to enrich Bush’s oil buddies – but I support the troops!” It’s that formulation that’s truly insulting.

But the part of his article that really stuck out was this paragraph:

But when you volunteer for the U.S. military, you pretty much know you’re not going to be fending off invasions from Mexico and Canada. So you’re willingly signing up to be a fighting tool of American imperialism, for better or worse. Sometimes you get lucky and get to fight ethnic genocide in Kosovo, but other times it’s Vietnam.

It’s interesting because it illustrates what seems to be a common position on the left – approval of U.S. military action in Kosovo, but complete disapproval of military action in Iraq. The left was either supportive or silent when President Clinton ordered the action in Kosovo. They certainly weren’t taking to the streets en masse with “Clinton=Hitler” signs. In what parallel universe is there any rational basis for reconciling these two positions? There was no assertion that Kosovo was pursuing WMD or posed any security threat to the United States. Remember, these folks opposed the invasion of Iraq before the invasion and subsequent investigation found no stockpiles of WMD in Iraq, when when the consensus view was that Iraq had such weapons. Some argue now as if they knew there were no WMD (not that the existence of WMD stockpiles was the sole rationale for the invasion, but no need to rehash all that now) when they opposed the invasion before it began. But that’s gross revisionism.

We suspect in this case that Stein isn’t what you’d call a deep thinker and likely just went along with the liberal zeitgeist – Vietnam bad, Kosovo good, Iraq bad, etc. – without giving it much thought. (Update: Mr. Stein is being interviewed on the radio by Hugh Hewitt, and confirming this hypothesis.)

More reaction from The Mudville Gazette, Michelle Malkin, Donald Sensing, and Hugh Hewitt.

Update: Here is that great essay on the “voice of the neuter” that’s been getting lots of attention the last few days. Worth a read.



posted by: The Editors @ 3:06 pm January 24, 2006



2 Comments

  1. What would you expect from a Liberal? I mean, let’s face it; if you are a Democrat, you can do now wrong, no matter how many you kill, or who you attacke/protect…add your own word. But if you are a Republican, well, you are an evil, bloodthirsty tyrant!

    The bottom line is the fact that there is…and always will be…a double standard: with the Left, and with the Media.

    Of course, the positive result of Klein’s blabberfest is that now, we, the American readership, know his true colors….

    Comment by T.J. — January 24, 2006 @ 7:01 pm January 24, 2006


  2. […] The Unalienable Right First, we must applaud Mr. Stein for at least being honest. Sure, his viewpoint is morally confused drivel, but at least he doesn’t hide his real view, like so many on the left do these days: “This is an illegal, immoral, unjust, fascist, Hitler-esque, neo-con war to enrich Bush’s oil buddies – but I support the troops!” It’s that formulation that’s truly insulting. […]

    Pingback by Flopping Aces » Blog Archive » A Lefty Admits He Doesn’t Support Our Soldiers — January 24, 2006 @ 7:06 pm January 24, 2006


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed for this post.


All comments are moderated, they will not appear immediately. Comments judged by the editors to be obscene, libelous, or otherwise inappropriate will be deleted. Comments will not be deleted because they disagree with the positions of this site. Respectful dissent is encouraged.

The opinions expressed by commenters are their own and do not necessarily represent the opinions of the owners of this website.